I had a very warm welcome from Jane Wilkinson and her Class. It was even nice to see a familiar face or two, students that I had met before. The nature of the class was more diverse than the two previous occasions. There were more Males in the class and the ages ranged from 16 - 29. within the class were four individuals that had " learning differences".
I had the same introductory lesson in Sign language to teach, so to mix things up a bit, I tweaked the exercises slightly. For example, rather than getting the whole class to mingle and sign the new phrases to each other, I split the whole into three mixed groups. I found that this approach had it's merits, the group watched each other and collectively corrected each other when signs were forgotten or inaccurately performed... It also prompted different ones to wonder about how to sign other things- such as numbers- and so when I rotated around the groups it gave me the opportunity to give a little extra to those that wanted it.
As I interacted with each group, I found that I was learning a little about some of the students, one young lady had a deaf uncle that I happened to know very well, this certainly broke the ice. Most importantly, I was able to pick up the names of numerous students, this became invaluable later during the discussion.
Last time out, I noticed how the discussion session can become dominated by the few. So this time around I tried a slightly different approach. As I allowed the pairs to deliberate over the Deaf culture statements, I took on board certain opinions that students had. When the discussion started, if I believed it was becoming dominated by a few individuals I did one of two things.
- I would point to a pair and mention a statement or raise a question they had made, invariably they would nod and take up the baton, making a comment themselves. On the odd occasion I would just get a nod and a glare that said " I don't want to say anything..." This was fine as I just carried on the point myself, although I would like to think that my mentioning something they had said would at least make them feel I was interested.
- Alternatively, I made a really effort to look intently - without freaking anyone out - at the faces of students. You can tell when someone is trying to say something, if I felt this was the case I used their names to ask them if there was something they wanted to add. If not I apologised for my mistake, but I found most of the time they again took up the opportunity afforded them thanks to the lull in dominant voices.
Perhaps the trickiest moment came towards the end... It harks back to some comments made in my " Campanology" blog. I was demonstrating some signing and one student laughed and shouted " That's funny, He looks like a spastic..." a collective sharp intake of breath was made by all the students.
Had she taken it upon herself to use an inappropriate term to make a slur against me? I don't think so... She had been an attentive and productive member during the entire session. So why had she said that? I don't really know, but I am of the opinion that at times all of us are let down by the correlation between what we are wanting to say in our brains and what actually comes out of our mouths. I was also weary of how an overreaction by me could have ruined what had been a positive experience.
Still it was inappropriate... Thankfully the gasp was followed up by her fellow peers bringing to her attention the undesirable use of such a word, she backtracked and apologised. Her peers know her better and work with her, some of the older ones are probably respected by her, so to have them address the issue is probably best for all concerned.
My area to improve on
It was a popular move when I got Jane - the tutor - involved with teaching some sign. As I come across different ones with some understanding, if they are willing, get them involved.