We focused primarily on these major areas:
- ADHD ( attention deficit hyperactivity disorder )
- often manifesting itself with hyperactivity, inattentiveness or combination of both.
- Autism / Aspergers
- difficulties with how a person communicates with, and relates to, other people. It also affects how they make sense of the world around them.
- Dyslexia
- difficulty with words (reading and spelling) and sometimes comprehension.
- Dyspraxia
- It is an impairment or immaturity of the organisation of movement.
If looking at this information wasn't scary enough, we were then introduced to three other terms
- Specific Learning difficulty
- Demonstrates a specific condition that impairs.
- Global Learning difficulty
- Demonstrates an overall impairment - non specific
- Co-morbidity.
- has a cross over of identifiable conditions.
It certainly is going to be a challenge to add flexibility to any course I run, so as to accommodate the various abilities of students so as to maintain interest. But to build in exercises and suitable outcomes that allow students with " learning differences" to take as much from the course as they can... Well that's a real challenge. Despite that, how reassuring it is to see the support in place for students and tutors.
I really felt that the following quote thankfully highlights the shift in attitude.
"Suppose you are a dyslexic student who can cope well with support, but not without.
How will your teacher discover your needs, and then meet them? How will your
teacher ensure that your needs are indeed being met by the support provided?
Each learner is unique and has individual needs. If the needs of our learners are
discovered and met, the chances of success are greatly increased. If you consider
the examples above, you will see that it is not enough to guess the needs of the
average student in your class. We need to discover and then meet individual needs,
and this can make the difference between failure and success for many students.
We used to teach courses. Now we teach students.
Education used to be a sieve: now it is a ladder. Poor teachers used to teach their
courses with little consideration for initial and diagnostic assessment, waiting to
see which students coped, and which didn't, and then perhaps dropped out. It
was common for A-level teachers to feel pleased if the numbers in their classes
dropped in the first few months: they said there was no point in having students
in their class who weren't up to it "
Petty,G. (2009). The professional in practice. In: Teaching Today a practical guide. 4th ed. Cheltnam: Nelson Thornes Ltd. p530.
As I watched the class exercise develop, it really brought to my mind that even an accommodating tutor could miss the point.
Seeing the numerous conditions get placed onto the floor as part of large crystal shaped jigsaw, it became more like a mirror. We were warned not to read too much into what we saw, but identifying traits that I have myself, reinforced in my mind that the whole structure of support isn't about tolerating a person or just creating something for them to do. Rather, just as I believe that despite my idiosyncrasies I have something positive to contribute, offering support is about aiding different ones to loosen any shackles that might exist, and allow them to positively contribute and make the most of their talents - we all have them somewhere.
A question did come to my mind... how do you identify the line between bad behaviour and a legitimate learning difference? Rest assured, I was told, it'll be discussed next week.
As part of a final group exercise, we were encouraged to to discuss the following questions:
- What have you learnt from this session?
- Explain how you could adapt your teaching and learning activities to meet the needs of all learners?
- Consider one resource that you are currently using, how could you make it more inclusive?
In the past, my tutors have taught many receptive skills by using video. This is an effective method as it allows for the tutor to monitor carefully what the class picks up and for class to see different signers in action, rather than just their own tutor, giving an opportunity for familiarising them with the concept of regional dialects for example.
Watching and understanding a signer on a flat screen, particularly from quite a distance can present challenges, such as picking up depth and signs specific to time - past, present and future. If the whole class was working from one screen, it is easy for some students to dominate, get the answers right and for the tutor to move on before the rest have caught up.
Using modern tablet devices would certainly improve this approach. Students would have more control over the video clip, revisiting sections that they didn't fully comprehend. It would be easier for a tutor to build differentiation into the lesson, as additional video clips of varying levels of difficulty could be available for the more and less advanced student.
With such a visual language certain technological advancements are certainly very useful.